Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

PURPOSE: To guide the vaccination of adults with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. METHODS: A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and nonrandomized studies on the efficacy and safety of vaccines used by adults with cancer or their household contacts. This review builds on a 2013 guideline by the Infectious Disease Society of America. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2013, to February 16, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 102 publications were included in the systematic review: 24 systematic reviews, 14 RCTs, and 64 nonrandomized studies. The largest body of evidence addressed COVID-19 vaccines. RECOMMENDATIONS: The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and prevent infection where feasible. Optimizing vaccination status should be considered a key element in the care of patients with cancer. This approach includes the documentation of vaccination status at the time of the first patient visit; timely provision of recommended vaccines; and appropriate revaccination after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or B-cell-depleting therapy. Active interaction and coordination among healthcare providers, including primary care practitioners, pharmacists, and nursing team members, are needed. Vaccination of household contacts will enhance protection for patients with cancer. Some vaccination and revaccination plans for patients with cancer may be affected by the underlying immune status and the anticancer therapy received. As a result, vaccine strategies may differ from the vaccine recommendations for the general healthy adult population vaccine.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Regionalization of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment in a Community-Based Population: Implementation and Early Results.

INTRODUCTION: Regionalization of care for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not been described for community-based settings. In 2015, we shifted AML induction from 21 local centers to 3 regional centers. METHODS: Using time-specific inception cohorts, we assessed whether regionalization was associated with the frequency of use of induction therapy, receipt of bone marrow transplantation, 60-day mortality (treatment toxicity), and 180-day mortality (treatment effectiveness). Information for all adult patients diagnosed with AML from 2013 to 2017 was obtained from the electronic health record. Multivariable methods were used to estimate the adjusted associations of induction, bone marrow transplantation, and death in relation to year of diagnosis before and after regionalization. RESULTS: Of 661 patients diagnosed during 2013 to 2017, 53% were ≥ 70 years, 22% were ≥ 80 years, and 10% died within the week following diagnosis. Comparing 2017 with 2013, the proportion of patients who received induction therapy increased 2.88 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55-5.35), and the proportion of non-acute promyelocytic leukemia patients receiving bone marrow transplantation increased 2.00 times (95% CI = 0.89-4.50). Regionalization was associated with lower 180-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.44-0.92), whereas change in 60-day mortality was not statistically significant (HR = 0.67; 95%CI = 0.43-1.04). CONCLUSION: In this community-based population, many patients were of advanced age yet benefitted from AML induction therapy delivered at a regionally specialized center. These early results suggest the benefit of regionalizing subspecialty leukemia care.

High-dose carmustine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been shown to be curative in a group of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A previous study has demonstrated equivalent outcomes with a conditioning regimen based on total body irradiation and another not based on total body irradiation with preparative therapy using cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide (CBV) in autologous HCT. We investigated the safety and efficacy of using CBV in an allogeneic setting. Patients were required to have relapsed or be at high risk for subsequent relapse of NHL. All patients had a fully HLA-matched sibling donor. Patients received carmustine (15 mg/kg), etoposide (60 mg/kg), and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg) on days -6, -4, and -2, respectively, followed by allogeneic HCT. All patients were treated with cyclosporine and methylprednisolone as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Thirty-one patients (median age, 46 years) who were felt to be inappropriate candidates for autologous transplantation were enrolled. Each subject had a median of 3 previous chemotherapy regimens. All patients engrafted. Fifteen of 31 patients are alive. Median follow-up time was 11.5 months (range, .4-126). There were 8 deaths due to relapse. Nonrelapse mortality (n = 8) included infection (n = 3), GVHD (n = 2), diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (n = 1), veno-occlusive disease in the setting of concurrent acute GVHD of the liver (n = 1), and leukoencephalopathy (n = 1). Probabilities of event-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 44% (95% confidence interval, 26%-62%) and 51% (33%-69%) at 1 year and 44% (26%-62%) and 47% (29%-65%) at 5 years. Probability of relapse was 33% (15%-51%) at 1 year and 5 years. Probability of nonrelapse mortality was 31% (13%-49%) at 1 year and 5 years. Incidences were 29% for acute GVHD and 39% for chronic GVHD. None of the 12 patients who developed chronic GVHD has disease recurrence. Patients who had required >3 previous chemotherapy regimens before HCT had an increased probability of relapse. CBV is an effective preparative regimen for patients with aggressive NHL who undergo allogeneic HCT.

Intermittent dosing of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor tipifarnib (R115777) in advanced malignant solid tumors: a phase I California Cancer Consortium Trial.

Tipifarnib (R115777) inhibits farnesylation of key proteins that modulate signaling pathways implicated in cell growth and proliferation, including members of the Ras and Rho families. It has broad-spectrum antiproliferative activity in vitro and in vivo. Clinical trials employing a continuous administration schedule have demonstrated dose-limiting neurotoxicity and myelosuppression. Preclinical studies have shown that intermittent oral administration can suppress tumor growth comparable to continuous administration. We conducted a National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase I trial to determine the feasibility of an intermittent dosing schedule of R115777 given orally twice daily on weeks 1 and 3 of a 28-day cycle in patients with malignant solid tumors. Starting dose was 300 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) with escalation by 300 mg b.i.d. increments over six dose levels to a maximum of 1800 mg b.i.d. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 neutropenia (ANC) with fever (38.3 degrees C or above) or a documented infection. Twenty-one patients with advanced solid tumors, all of whom had prior systemic therapy, were accrued. Grade 3 fatigue was dose limiting for two of three patients at the 900 mg b.i.d. dose level. Although no responses were seen, four of six patients with stable disease remained on study for at least a year (16, 17, 13 and 12 months) before developing progressive disease. Three of these prolonged stable disease patients had non-small cell lung cancer. We conclude that intermittent dosing of R115777 is feasible and tolerable. The recommended phase II dose is 600 mg orally b.i.d. on alternate weeks.

Gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: a phase II California cancer consortium trial.

A phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-containing regimens and prospectively categorized for platinum response status. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 given intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The status of p53 in pretreatment tumor tissue was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Sixty-one patients who progressed or recurred following platinum-based therapy were enrolled, 26 platinum-sensitive and 35 platinum-refractory. A median of 4 treatment courses (range, 2-7 courses) was delivered. Of the 55 patients assessable for response, there was 1 confirmed complete response and 3 with a confirmed partial response for an overall response proportion of 7%. Twenty-one patients had stable disease while 28 progressed and 2 patients had an unconfirmed partial response. Three of the responders (2 confirmed, 1 unconfirmed) were platinum-refractory. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for all patients were 4.1 months and 8.6 months, respectively. Median PFS and overall survival for the platinum-sensitive and platinum-refractory cohorts were 5.4 months versus 3.1 months, and 11.9 months versus 7.1 months, respectively. Toxicity was principally hematologic with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 21% and grade 4 platelets in 8%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Twenty-four of 33 patients (73%) had p53-positive tumors. Although no significant association between platinum sensitivity and p53 status was seen, patients with platinum-sensitive disease and negative p53 by IHC had a trend toward longer survival compared to those with platinum-refractory disease and/or p53 positivity (P = 0.06). We concluded that salvage gemcitabine in this dose and schedule is safe and tolerable in previously platinum-treated patients with NSCLC.

Platinum-free combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based regimens have improved response rates and survival in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract. However, the toxicities of platinum-based chemotherapy are considerable. Regimens with reduced toxicity that are applicable to a broader group of TCC patients without sacrificing activity therefore are of interest. METHODS: Because gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and methotrexate have each been reported to possess single-agent activity in this disease, the authors evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of fixed doses of paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2) over 3 hours) and methotrexate (30 mg/m(2)) with escalating doses of gemcitabine (800-1000 mg/m(2)), all given on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days, in patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic TCC. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Two patients were ineligible and were excluded from analysis. Because no dose-limiting toxicity occurred in the first 4 patients who were given gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m(2), the gemcitabine dose was escalated to 1000 mg/m(2) in the next 21 patients. Of the 21 patients assessable for response, 6 had achieved a complete response (CR) and 6 had achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 57%. An additional patient was converted to a CR surgically. The median overall and progression-free survival times were 18 months and 9.2 months, respectively. Toxicity was predominantly neutropenia: Grade 3 in 9 patients (39%) and Grade 4 in 4 patients (17%) (according to the Southwest Oncology Group Toxicity Criteria, version 12/1994). One patient died of septic shock associated with febrile neutropenia after three cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and methotrexate at this dose and schedule was found to possess activity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TCC. Further studies of this regimen are warranted.